Built On Nothing - Article2
AN ATTACK ON THE NATIVITY STORY
An ongoing jokey email correspondence between a group of old school friends included the following 2 emails:-
The Nativity (scientifically accurate version)
According to many scholars, the events of the nativity took place around 7 BC. Given that “BC” stands for “before Christ [was born]” and the nativity is the story of the birth of Christ, this means that Christ was born around 7 years before Christ was born.
This is actually one of the least illogical things to happen during the birth of Christ.
The Virgin Mary was betrothed to the carpenter Joseph. However, theVirgin Mary was pregnant with the Messiah. This occurred when Mary was visited by a heavenly angel named Gabriel who told her that she would become pregnant with a child who would be called Jesus, which is something of a self-fulfilling prediction; if an angel appears and tells you that an all-powerful God wants your baby to be named Jesus, you’d probably go along with it. I recently met a child named “Audi”, so it doesn’t take much to influence this decision.
According to the Bible, Mary asked the angel how she could become pregnant when she was a virgin, and the angel Gabriel told Mary that the Holy Spirit would “come upon you”.
In fairness, that’s surprisingly close for a book written by old celibate men 20 centuries ago.
Mary then told Joseph what had happened and that she was now pregnant. Scientifically, there are 3 possible explanations here:
. The thing with the Angel and Holy Ghost is genuinely what happened.
· Mary was actually some form of hitherto unknown human-plantor human-Komodo Dragon hybrid, capable of undergoing self-fertilisation.
· Mary wasn’t a virgin and had fallen pregnant after sleeping with someone who wasn’t her partner Joseph, and came up with this fantastical story to explain it to Joseph rather than admit she’d been unfaithful, and Joseph subsequently believed her.
In truth, any one of these options would still count as a miracle, so the story is still intact.
Mary and Joseph then had to travel from Galilee, where they lived, to Bethlehem, where they needed to be. Reasons for why they had to make this journey remain unclear. Some say it was because of a tax, some say it was for a census, others say it never actually happened so why give a damn? But let’s ignore those humourless killjoys, and continue with this scientific critique of the nativity.
The distance between Galilee and Bethlehem is around 80 miles, according to Google maps, which takes around 2 days to travel on foot. Of course, Mary was heavily pregnant so her average speed would have been reduced. Of course, this is an optimistic estimate. Mary and Joseph wouldn’t have had google maps. They would have had to use some primitive equivalent like Streetmap or the AA Route Planner.
Upon arriving in Bethlehem, Mary and Joseph found that there were no rooms available. This casts doubt on the reason for their being that they had to pay a tax. If everyone were in Bethlehem for a census then, judging by past observations, around 1% of the people there would be practicing Jedi. As unlikely as it sounds, this would make for an even more exciting nativity. And of course, Anakin Skywalker was also the result of a virgin birth.
Mary and Joseph were unable to find somewhere to stay, which posed something of an issue as around this point Mary went into labour. They eventually ended up in a stable, surrounded by domesticated farm animals, which violates any number of health and safety protocols. When the baby was born, they swathed him in cloth and placed him in a manger.
For those who don’t know, a manger is somewhere where food for farm animals is kept. Ergo, Mary and Joseph placed their newborn baby, believed to be the saviour of mankind, in a container that animals eat out of, in front of the animals that usually eat of it. At this point you have to wonder whether God almighty, in all his infinite wisdom, had chosen poorly when selecting potential parents.
While this happened, an angel appeared to some shepherds on a mountain near Bethlehem and told them a baby had been born and they should go and worship it. We can’t prove that this didn’t happen, but it’s probably worth mentioning that sparsely populated mountainous regions in the Middle East are ideal locations for growing opium, and shepherding can be a very boring job.
Also, three wise men from an unspecified Eastern country saw an unspecified bright object in the sky that that lead them to Bethlehem, where they somehow predicted they’d meet a messiah, as you do. They took gifts of Gold, Frankincense and Myrrh. Frankincense and Myrrh are two fragrances used in aromatherapy and funerals respectively.
So, basically, three men followed an unspecified bright object over hundreds of miles of desert in order to meet a baby, about whom all they knew was that it would have a nose, might need money and would eventually die. For this they were considered ‘wise men’. This goes to show that wisdom is clearly a subjective term.
As everyone gathered around the stable, a brightly lit host of angels appeared above it, starting a tradition of needlessly gaudy brightly lit decorations on domestic dwellings at Christmas that endures to this day. It is also traditional to have highly educated wise people at births too, but they’re known as “medical professionals”.
The end.
I enjoyed x’s scientific version of the Christmas story (the Komodo dragon aspect is worth thinking about more). It reminded me of those brilliant discussions at school on “life, the universe and everything”.
Science now explains everything – it tells us that we are just animals (no more significant ultimately than a baboon or a slug); each human life is utterly insignificant against astronomical time and space; our lives have no ultimate purpose/meaning/value beyond a ruthless struggle to survive; all our noblest thoughts and beliefs are just meaningless chemical reactions in the brain; altruism and kindness are just sophisticated survival strategies. As Stephen Hawking reminds us, we human beings are just “chemical scum on the surface of a moderate sized planet”.
So maybe our New Year resolution should be to reject all those daft unscientific values and beliefs our society derives from the Bible – that every human being has eternal value and significance; that there is ultimate meaning and purpose in life; that some things are absolutely right or wrong; that mercy, goodness, kindness, morality & justice are not just artificial constructs to regulate the anthill of human affairs.
It seems a no brainer to live our lives scientifically in 2014 without ultimate values, significance, meaning or morality - unless the 7 BC baby actually was God.
CONCLUSION
The “Nativity (scientifically accurate version)” was lighthearted and funny (well, maybe a little bit funny). However it was also a clear rubbishing of the Bible and the Christian faith. It is unlikely that anyone would send out a similar email about Islam. Somehow Christianity is fair game for mocking and disrespect in a way that other religions aren’t. It seemed right to respond. Let’s question the unthinking adverse comments people make about our faith and the intellectual emptiness usually underlying them.